Donald Trump’s lawyers have filed fresh arguments to try to block or severely limit a criminal subpoena for his tax records, calling it harassment of the president.
Lawyers filed a rewritten lawsuit in Manhattan federal court to challenge the subpoena by Manhattan’s state prosecutor on grounds they believe conform with how the US Supreme Court said the subpoena can be contested.
The high court ruled earlier this month that a Manhattan prosecutor could subpoena tax records from Mr Trump’s accountant over his objections.
But the court said he could challenge the subpoena as improper just as anyone else can.
His lawyers had argued that the president could not be criminally investigated while he was in office.
In their new court papers, they said the subpoena of his tax records was “wildly overbroad” and “amounts to harassment of the president”.
Manhattan district attorney Cyrus Vance Jr sought the tax records in part for a probe of how Mr Trump’s then-personal lawyer arranged during the 2016 presidential race to keep porn actress Stormy Daniels and model Karen McDougal from airing claims of extramarital affairs with Mr Trump. He has denied the affairs.
Mr Vance, a Democrat, has requested eight years of the Republican president’s personal and corporate tax records.
The Supreme Court returned the case to a federal judge in Manhattan who has arranged for both sides to finish filing their legal arguments over challenges to the subpoena by mid-August.
Last year, the same judge ruled against Mr Trump in a written opinion that was upheld by the 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel