It was good that the Guardian, (July 2) printed prominently the opportunity that now exists for viable suggestions from the public through the consultation on the future of the former Knutsford Courts building.

Saving the town’s heritage does not mean keeping places as they are, with no new uses and no new development. Instead, as English Heritage recognises, development proposals should be encouraged where they conserve and enhance the significance of historic assets, rather than being protected from any such proposals at all.

We need to avoid losing heritage whether to the bulldozer or the weeds, or the misplaced wishes of developers and landowners. That is especially true of Knutsford whose natural and cultural heritage has been recognised widely, but that does not mean “no” to change. For many, including Knutsford Conservation and Heritage Group and the Heritage Centre, the court’s consultation is welcome news on the future of the building.

We’re aware of adaptation possibilities already suggested such as a future Health and Wellbeing Centre, or relocation for the Cheshire Archives and Local Studies. There are many people, including our elected councillors, who might progress these or other possible uses. Guardian readers’ suggestions are invited through the consultation.

Other than financial viability, an important issue is how the fine Grade II architectural quality of the former courts building will be respected. Hopefully the system in place requires permission and consents for adaptations that will ensure that respect, while adding to the better functioning of Knutsford.

Paul Webster Knutsford Conservation and Heritage Group (KCHG)