Secrecy laws stop publication of HS2 report

Knutsford Guardian: Transport secretary Patrick McLoughlin Transport secretary Patrick McLoughlin

SECRECY laws understood not to have been used since the Iraq war are believed to be in place to stop the publication of a high-speed rail project report.

Transport secretary Patrick McLoughlin is said to have invoked the secrecy laws to prevent publication of an HS2 Project Assessment Report produced by the Major Projects Authority.

Action groups campaigning to stop the £50billion rail link have reacted by suggesting the report is being withheld as it is ‘damning’ for sections of the government.

Richard Houghton, of HS2 Action Alliance, said: "Secrecy and withholding of information kills governments - especially in an era when public and business alike are deeply suspicious of politicians.

“That is something which should be carefully considered not just by the current government, but any likely future Labour-led government.

"We obviously have not had access to the MPA report into HS2, although as with everything of this nature there are leaks and rumours.

“These lead us to believe that the report is damning and could see heads rolling in both the Department for Transport and other sections of government.”

Mr Houghton believes the proposed project will blight 500,000 homes, of which he predicts 2 per cent will receive compensation, and generate massive environmental damage.

"We cannot work out how a MPA Project Assessment Report is not in the public interest,” he added.

“Independent research says the majority of the population does not want HS2, so why shouldn’t the public know what the MPA has to say on its viability?”

Comments (3)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

2:17pm Tue 4 Feb 14

MrBenggo says...

Secret courts,closing hospitals without consultation,gagging law and now this suppressing plans for a railway.
Next it will be a one party state,so all you "they are all the same"and "politics don't interest me"and "whats the use in voting"people,get off your backsides at the next election and vote these b astards out.
You may well be doing alright now but who knows what they have plans for.
Secret courts,closing hospitals without consultation,gagging law and now this suppressing plans for a railway. Next it will be a one party state,so all you "they are all the same"and "politics don't interest me"and "whats the use in voting"people,get off your backsides at the next election and vote these b astards out. You may well be doing alright now but who knows what they have plans for. MrBenggo

2:25pm Tue 4 Feb 14

jimjamhartford says...

MrBenggo I agree wholeheartedly. The elite hold the majority in contempt while they push through their crackpot ideas. We desperately need some big changes with the system and this can be achieved by voting but NOT for the three main parties. Vote Looney, UKIP, BNP, Green, Respect, EDP, Christian, or better still Independent. Anyone but LabLibCon. Give these parasites a kick up the backside! (ok, maybe miss out BNP).
MrBenggo I agree wholeheartedly. The elite hold the majority in contempt while they push through their crackpot ideas. We desperately need some big changes with the system and this can be achieved by voting but NOT for the three main parties. Vote Looney, UKIP, BNP, Green, Respect, EDP, Christian, or better still Independent. Anyone but LabLibCon. Give these parasites a kick up the backside! (ok, maybe miss out BNP). jimjamhartford

8:14pm Tue 4 Feb 14

MrBenggo says...

jimjamhartford,
the main three have had their day and as you are saying,and yes I agree anyone bar the main three,or two,if you discount the Libdems.
The problem is many people vote for a party because they have always voted for that party,as have their parents,and the party in opposition is not so much better than the party in power,but the party in power is so bad.
jimjamhartford, the main three have had their day and as you are saying,and yes I agree anyone bar the main three,or two,if you discount the Libdems. The problem is many people vote for a party because they have always voted for that party,as have their parents,and the party in opposition is not so much better than the party in power,but the party in power is so bad. MrBenggo

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree